tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post8062904446843635899..comments2024-03-28T00:50:16.901-05:00Comments on Life at the Harris County Criminal Justice Center: The Big Jolly ConspiracyMurray Newmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00662196272138109874noreply@blogger.comBlogger91125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-78633746596513660862012-02-14T16:43:23.352-06:002012-02-14T16:43:23.352-06:00Murray,
Two middle aged bald guys going out to th...Murray,<br /><br />Two middle aged bald guys going out to the playground, whipping out our junk and calling it a duel is a disturbing mental picture. It will also likely result in mandatory jail time. Can you blog from the Polunski Unit?David Ryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18040068899984409414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-19154037256281895082012-02-11T12:38:01.733-06:002012-02-11T12:38:01.733-06:00Mr. Ryan
I doubt seriously that the posters
on th...Mr. Ryan<br /><br />I doubt seriously that the posters<br />on this blog is using Big Jolly or A Harris County Lawyer to make a decision as to whom to vote for. You may need to spend some time and go back to past posts. Once you read the post then research what is said by whom. Talk to some of the past employees. You may find yourself with a little different mindset.<br /><br />You make some valid points in your post. Justice should not be about politics. The office of DA should not be a political post period.<br /><br />That’s where the problem comes in. DA Lycos is a politician in every way imaginable. Her heart is not into the running of the DA's office, it is in the running to win the election.<br /><br />She has poor management and leadership skills. Instead of utilizing the skills of intelligent prosecutors she has, she micro manages. The ADAs were hired for their ability I would assume. Why doesn't she allow them great latitude in handling the cases assigned to them? <br /><br />Why must they look over their shoulder or base their decisions on fear of retribution. That is a horrible way to have to work. The condition these ADAs must work in is simply not acceptable. <br /><br />I want the ADAs to give 110% when they are preparing to go to trial. I want their mind on the trial, the facts, and not on how much trouble they will be in if this or that happens. I want them focused on putting the criminal away so that he cannot commit more atrocities. I want them to go forth in the quest for justice knowing that the boss has their back. I want them to give all you defense lawyers a run for your money. hehe (couldn't resist)<br /><br />Now, this is where this affects me. I live in Harris County, the majority of my family and friends live here as well. I want criminals to know that HC is not the place to mess around because our judicial system will deal severely with them. So far under Lycos that has not happened. Now you can drive drunk and get deferred, call it by any name you want, that's what it amounts to. I believe the law says that you cannot have deferred for DWI.<br />How about those residue cases, yep you can walk free cause Lycos has decided not to follow the law as it is written. So maybe I am just ignorant to the facts if so clue me in.<br /><br />As far as candidates, I like the fact that Mr. Anderson can work both sides of the fence so to speak. Yes I have checked out Mr. Anderson. No, I did not just rely on AHCL or BJ. There is much information available on the internet. I have spoken at length with people that know Mr. Anderson. He is as he appears to be. The one thing that will lead him well is his ability to deal with people. He will put passion that is missing back into the running of the DAs office. He will bring the office to a place of respect and integrity once again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-91239691973983950202012-02-10T20:18:41.641-06:002012-02-10T20:18:41.641-06:00Mr. Ryan, I have a few responses to some of your ...Mr. Ryan, I have a few responses to some of your points:<br /><br />1. "You did not come here for “fair and balanced”. It is not, nor has it ever been."<br /><br />You are correct about this but it is because we expect our DA to be fair and balanced. She is not and never has been. Those of us who know her well (unlike the general public) see a person who is far from being fair or balanced.<br /><br />2. "Judge Anderson is just as political as Judge Lykos. As was Chuck Rosenthal. As was Johnny Holmes. "<br /><br />Your statement makes me think you don't know Mike that well and that you didn't know Holmes at all. Chuck had many faults but being terribly political wasn't one of them. Granted, you didn't define your concept of 'political', but however much Anderson, Holmes, or Rosenthal were political, they are a small candle compared to the spotlight that is Lykos. Only Lykos has hired a cadre of media folks to churn out accolades of her every move. If you look objectively at her claimed accomplishments, you will almost always discover a layer of deception woven into the fabric. She thrives on bragging on herself and having others fawn over her. NEVER have I seen Anderson, Rosenthal, nor Holmes do anything like this.<br /><br />3. "No one will mention that cops are actually upset because promotions for felony arrests -<br /><br />Neither HPD nor HCSO promotes people based on how many arrests they have made. Their promotions are based on a combination of test scores, seniority points, and in some cases interviews.<br /><br />The real point I want to make here is that this blog is decidedly anti-Lykos but not without over-whelming evidence. Her inability to manage the office, her lack of legal knowledge, her vindictiveness, and the fact that she filters every single decision she makes on how it will play out politically-not whether it is right or wrong.<br /><br />If she isn't defeated this year, the DAO will not recover from the damage she has done in this generation. We post our comments because of our love for the office and the sense of loss we feel because of what she is doing. If you think about it, that is truly profound and explains why this blog exists.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-84669310105776497232012-02-10T18:44:37.295-06:002012-02-10T18:44:37.295-06:00David,
Um, I don't know whether to thank you ...David,<br /><br />Um, I don't know whether to thank you or challenge you to a duel. Just kidding. I still don't get why everybody keeps talking about my privates. Do I have a chronic problem with remembering to zip my fly or something?<br /><br />You bring up numerous good points and I am working on a blog post that may explain my "politics" and why I write things the way I do. <br /><br />I think the reason that I wrote on and on about de-linking from Big Jolly was to work through it in my own head. I like Dave Jennings but what he was writing and allowing others to write on his blog troubled me.<br /><br />Quite frankly, the post started out as an attempt to mock how easily one can start a "conspiracy" idea with nothing but conjecture and an over-emphasis on coincidences. When I wrote the post on Friday evening, I nearly deleted it after reading it. I thought I was being overly dramatic and, as you pointed out, I could just as easily have de-linked and not mentioned my reasons.<br /><br />Just as I was about to delete the Big Jolly post, somebody forwarded my Lykos' campaign e-mail citing all of the posts that Dave had cranked out in the past days. It seemed to me that as much as Dave was willing to call 2 Grand Jury investigations, and a Texas Rangers and FBI investigation as a politically motivated witch hunt, it was only fair to point out his bias as well.<br /><br />And the next thing I know, the paparazzi is all over my privates!<br /><br />Yes, I am very biased towards Mike Anderson. I think he is a true leader and a born prosecutor. But I say that because I know the man. Not because of electability or because I fall into one faction of Republican or another. I'll expand on that in a later post (hopefully this weekend).<br /><br />Thanks, as always, for writing in and signing your name.Murray Newmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00662196272138109874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-87003043177957352352012-02-10T18:23:56.699-06:002012-02-10T18:23:56.699-06:00Part 2 of 2:
Chuck Rosenthal fought to keep gay s...Part 2 of 2:<br /><br />Chuck Rosenthal fought to keep gay sex illegal. Was it not politics for so called Christian conservatives? When he refused to accept the new gun laws, and insisted it was an affirmative defense and not a bar to arrest, that was not politics? Cops overwhelmingly oppose a citizen’s right to bear arms. They say safety; I say the Constitution. And we both have political backing for our positions.<br /><br />FWIW, I am heavily involved in a charity named for a murdered cop. His killer is set for re-trial, and the defense now wants a delay because Lykos is being investigated. Sure, it is good lawyering. It is also good politics.<br /><br />I have not yet decided whom to support in the election. It will not be Lloyd Oliver. I appeared before Judge Lykos when she was on the bench. It was decidedly unpleasant. It is why whenever Murray refers to Judge Lykos as “Snook’ems,” I laugh out loud. Appearing before Judge Anderson was no picnic, either. Judge Anderson was the best advocate for the State while he was on the bench.<br /><br />I remain unconvinced that criminal justice will improve if Judge Anderson is elected, but I am open to being persuaded. If this FBI investigation turns up wrong doing, I will certainly be persuaded. But if Big Jolly or A Harris County Lawyer is your reason for supporting a candidate, then you are persuaded by the politics and not a concern for justice.David Ryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18040068899984409414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-53633377021791601732012-02-10T18:23:34.069-06:002012-02-10T18:23:34.069-06:00Part 1 of 2:
I have hesitated to post on this. E...Part 1 of 2:<br /><br />I have hesitated to post on this. Even now, I question the wisdom of doing so. Nevertheless, into the breach…<br /><br />Murray is a very good attorney. I refer him business. I will continue to refer him business. I referred him business even after this particular post. He is good people. We occasionally share a cocktail or two. I hope that will continue. His scrotum is between his doctor, lady, and self.<br /><br />Anyone who has read this blog knows it is quite partisan. You did not come here for “fair and balanced”. It is not, nor has it ever been. At least he does post those who disagree, but it is beyond reason to think the majority of people who post here do not share his views. While I do not like the anonymous posts, it is again his prerogative. It is his right under the Constitution. And, because Judge Lykos has been known to retaliate against those with whom she disagrees, a necessary evil (although I question the sanity of anyone who posts disparaging remarks about an employer in a public forum).<br /><br />It is Murray’s prerogative to link, and de-link, anyone he chooses. While it was convenient to click on Big Jolly’s link, it’s not as though it is particularly hard to get there if you choose to do so. So, what is really lost?<br /><br />It would have been better for him to quietly de-link and if asked, simply state his prerogative to do so. He chose not to, and for that, you can question his judgment for explaining. Questioning his testicular fortitude is utter nonsense.<br /><br />I do find his lengthy defenses of his decision to de-link Big Jolly somewhat childish. I read the allegedly offending posts on Big Jolly’s blog. I do not find them offensive. I do not find Big Jolly to be a shill. I find it to be a refreshing counter-balance to the onslaught of anti-Lykos you get here.<br /><br />It is fair, in my opinion, to point to the hypocrisy. Judge Anderson is just as political as Judge Lykos. As was Chuck Rosenthal. As was Johnny Holmes. You will not find it here. Therefore, it is laughable to point the finger at Lykos and ignore Anderson. The District Attorney is an elected, political office. As it should be.<br /><br />Trace cases are a good example. Judge Lykos chose to stop taking these cases, and was hailed for the decision by everyone except cops. Crime is down; the jail population is finally down. The warnings of crack heads who would have been in jail and not burglarizing homes or abducting children have not come to fruition. Statistically speaking, something awful is bound to happen, and Judge Anderson will use it to his political advantage, ignoring that when he was on the bench he, too, called for decriminalization or not filing trace cases. And Murray will be loathe to mention it. No one will mention that cops are actually upset because promotions for felony arrests and federal grant money that comes with these arrests on the phony war on drugs are really the issue.<br /><br />A reality of budgets is that there is only so much you can do. Mandatory probation on first offense trace cases came from the legislature because Harris County alone accounted for almost half the state jail population on trace cases. Judges like Brian Rains got around that by sentencing these folks to county jail time, helping exacerbate the jail overcrowding conditions. So, Judge Anderson pledges to clog the dockets with these cases, which will be transferred to state jail court, where Judge Rains now presides after losing his re-election bid. Utter nonsense, but good politics.David Ryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18040068899984409414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-65788779804828742802012-02-08T18:08:42.634-06:002012-02-08T18:08:42.634-06:00Grits:
I (and many others) highly agree with Murra...Grits:<br />I (and many others) highly agree with Murray's post. What folks lik you can't seem to grasp is how two-faced, narcissistic, and incompetent Lykos is. The majority of the people who work for her and good, honest folks who would have been totally happy and supportive of Lykos were it not for her character defects. No one wants to come to work every day for a person who proves almost daily that she has no business being there. Her mismanagement has left the office in shambles. It is sad that people like yourself can't or won't believe those who are eye witnesses to how bad she really is.<br /><br />Lykos is a master politician who conceals her true self. It makes those of us who see this in action sick to our stomachs.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-53694562054949424812012-02-08T08:07:44.096-06:002012-02-08T08:07:44.096-06:00Grits,
First and foremost, Dave Jennings is not so...Grits,<br />First and foremost, Dave Jennings is not someone that I consider to be my enemy. I consider him my friend and someone that I like very much. <br />Second, I did not de-link from him because I disagreed with him. If I delinked with people that I disagreed with, I'd pretty much be down to only having links with the Houston Texans fan club page. You and I rarely (if ever) agree and Mark Bennett and I only agree about 5% of the time. I actually try to get more people to read Paul Kennedy even though we rarely agree and he pretty much makes you look like Justice Scalia. Trust me, it wasn't sensitivity that lead me to de-link Big Jolly.<br />But, what I would throw out to you is would you put a link up for the "Re-Elect John Bradley" campaign where it cited his rationality and fairness in the handling of all his cases ever? Maybe you would, but I'd be surprised. At some point you have to draw the line on what you no longer can vouch for.<br />I didn't de-link from Big Jolly because of his conspiracy article. I didn't de-link from him when he was letting that idiot Don Hooper blast me under pseudonyms. I de-linked from him when he cranked out three days worth of articles that were absolutely nothing more than just advertising for Lykos.<br />Third, you point out that my understanding of politics is lacking compared to him. Well, no kidding. I'm not a politician, nor do I play one on TV. I have said forever that partisan politics have absolutely no place in the Criminal Justice world. I'm not here to win legislative races. I'm here to try to let people know about what is going on in the courts. That's it. <br />And finally, the idea that it is because of the "over-the-top" stuff I write that creates the need for "David Square"? That's kind of like telling a lady that her husband wouldn't hit her so much if she'd just quit back talking him. I know you don't agree with me, but Pat Lykos IS as bad as what I, and the commenters on this blog say. She really is as cartoonishly arrogant and foolish as we've pointed out. This isn't an exaggeration. We know her from having been around here for a long time. <br />And finally, just some food for thought. Even if you think my "Big Jolly Conspiracy" is way off base, it has a hell of a lot more evidence to suggest that it is real than the 185th Grand Jury Conspiracy did.<br />I look forward to seeing myself ridiculed on your blog now, Scott.<br />But I still won't de-link from you.Murray Newmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00662196272138109874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-36476555709514738402012-02-08T07:13:21.567-06:002012-02-08T07:13:21.567-06:00Murray, you're the one touting conspiracy theo...Murray, you're the one touting conspiracy theories! Jolly's just following Mark Bennett's lead alleging a politicized grand jury, but you're not calling Benentt out.<br /><br />As for Benizon, you don't even understand who he is or WHY Lykos might hire him (hint: it had nothing to do with the blogosphere). You don't understand the folks you're criticizing nor their motivations, apparently at all: Dave Jennings isn't shilling for his pal, he's shilling for the REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT!! And you more than anyone have helped drive partisans like David-squared (Benizon and Jennings) toward Lykos with presumptive, unfair, one-sided and over-the-top attacks that non-foaming-at-the-mouth workaday Republicans find as off-base and nutty as I often do.<br /><br />If you think Big Jolly strays from his area of expertise by discussing the grand jury, perhaps you'll agree you equally stray from your baliwick in any and every discussion of electoral politics: Seriously, it's like watching a life-long checkers player who's decided to try their hand at a chess tournament.<br /><br />Two closing observations: "Grossly misinformed" is not a synonym for "disagrees with me," and finally, even if David-squared are evil incarnate and secretly have nothing but the worst intentions that your fertile imagination might impugn them with, you forget the wise, old adage: Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. You'll never win an argument by disengaging.Gritsforbreakfasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10152152869466958902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-67208212960074034002012-02-07T17:32:08.523-06:002012-02-07T17:32:08.523-06:00I don't know Murray. I don't know what ki...I don't know Murray. I don't know what kind of man he is so I don't have enough information form an opinion, good or bad. But, having been a member of the front page posters at LST (posting under the blogosphere name Hamous), I do know David Jennings and all the other former LST posters that have come here to speak up. You'd be hard-pressed to find a better group of guys. I've seen nothing here to even come close to causing me to question my opinion of them.<br /><br />What I do see here is predominantly a bunch of people named "Anonymous" hurling conjecture, unfounded speculation, and downright vulgarities at others because the Anonymi candidate of choice is running against the current DA. Honestly, it looks like many of you have taken lessons from Saul Alinsky. It's pretty disgusting.<br /><br />I'm not (and have never been) a fan of Lykos, but if this crowd is representative of her opponent's supporters I think I'll be skipping the box in this race.Mark Tiptonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-23461802553266732152012-02-07T17:11:08.918-06:002012-02-07T17:11:08.918-06:00Just saw Ted Oberg on Live at Five. He reported t...Just saw Ted Oberg on Live at Five. He reported that the FBI and TX Rangers were at the DA's office today investigating the office's investigation of the 185th Grand Jury and others! Oberg said he would have more info at 6:00. What do you insiders know?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-27724601347205172502012-02-07T14:42:45.930-06:002012-02-07T14:42:45.930-06:00Mark,
Go to Andersonda.com, click get involved and...Mark,<br />Go to Andersonda.com, click get involved and request them. they will be delivered ASAP!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-47305108769683571122012-02-07T12:19:54.773-06:002012-02-07T12:19:54.773-06:00LOL. Well, Murray. Seems you really hit a nerve....LOL. Well, Murray. Seems you really hit a nerve. He's calling in all the reserves to attack you. Well done. <br /><br />There's no need to point out how ridiculous the Squakbox post is. I think he did a good enough job himself. <br /><br />Conspiracy theories set aside, the bottom line is...it will be Lykos versus Mike Anderson in the Repbulican primary. <br /><br />Lykos is Republican in name only (RINO). Nothing she has DONE shows she is a conservative Republican. She even brags about putting 1,000 crack heads back on the street. Conservative? No. What the voters REALLY want? NO.<br /><br />Once Republican voters in Harris County grasp the fact that she is WAY too liberal, corruption allegations aside, there won't even be a contest. <br /><br />The problem is, getting the word out. As of now, the Chronicle sings her praises and the only reporter standing up to her and demanding the truth is Ted Oberg. And even most of his stories are buried in the 6pm broadcast, not the main 10pm news. <br /><br />So its up to Mike Anderson and the true conservative voters to get the word out. Time to roll up our sleeves and get to work. <br /><br />Now, where do I get the Anderson yard signs and bumper stickers?Mark W. Stephensnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-53081945913577075082012-02-07T12:13:58.410-06:002012-02-07T12:13:58.410-06:007:11 a.m.-
Your comment is well-stated and ties a...7:11 a.m.-<br /><br />Your comment is well-stated and ties all the facts together. Your comment belongs in the Editorial section of the Chronicle. Unfortunately, they don't print many real facts about Lykos.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-48996139590304127412012-02-07T10:55:25.547-06:002012-02-07T10:55:25.547-06:00Mr. Noise:
Sir, your point is well made.
The ru...Mr. Noise:<br /><br />Sir, your point is well made. <br /><br />The rules of engagement ought to be applied equally to all parties.<br /><br />Notwithstanding, evil often clouds the rational judgment of its opposition.<br /><br />Murray is a good man who serves his clients, friends and causes without reservation......sometimes we all need to step back and take a breath to fully appreciate the goal and our actions in furtherance thereof.BLACK INKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03806198898618859706noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-16622110197335274012012-02-07T10:43:23.703-06:002012-02-07T10:43:23.703-06:00Dear Anonymouth
Welcome to my NWOR listDear Anonymouth<br /><br />Welcome to my NWOR listAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-58680943979152343252012-02-07T10:37:08.164-06:002012-02-07T10:37:08.164-06:00Why do all of these people who write in to defend ...Why do all of these people who write in to defend Big Jolly fantasize about your testicles or you with your pants down?<br /><br />Disturbing.Scott C. Popehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15307985210183952341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-78097566380101217562012-02-07T10:20:16.673-06:002012-02-07T10:20:16.673-06:00You may call me Mr. Noise.
Dear Squawk, Mr. Noise...<i> You may call me Mr. Noise.</i><br /><br />Dear Squawk, Mr. Noise, Mr. Fuller:<br /><br />I like you. You remind me of Terrell Owens with your numerous third person references. Good grief. <br /><br /><br />Sincerely,<br /><br />I love me some me; and<br />He Hate MeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-44167923288644161082012-02-07T09:27:35.919-06:002012-02-07T09:27:35.919-06:00First of all let me introduce myself. My REAL nam...First of all let me introduce myself. My REAL name is Walt Fuller. My alias when blogging and logging into conjecture ridden blogs such as this is Squawkbox Noise. You may call me Mr. Noise. I was the moderator, a contributor, webhead and all round nice guy participant at LST. I want to clear up a couple of Mr. Murray's conjectures.<br /> <br />First a disclaimer: I am retired from political blogging, I am friends with David Benzion, David Jennings and Texpat and anyone else that was brave enough to associate their names with mine on the LST blogroll. Heh and I am no ones shill.<br /> <br />I do not have a dog in the hunt in Harris County politics because fortunately I live far enough away it does not matter to me. What dog I do have in the hunt is the impugning of my friends character.<br /> <br />Now Mr. Murray let me set a couple of your "fantasies" straight.<br /> <br /><b>hopefully scoop up all of Lone Star Times' followers as well.</b><br /> <br />At the time of David Benzion's hire within the District Attorneys office LonesStartimes.com had shut it doors for over a year. I do not recall a very public announcement concerning his hire. I know for a fact that Mr. Benzion does not maintain an active, much less updated Facebook or Twitter page so we can eliminate that notification. Finally since I am the one that closed up the shop and I personally destroyed the databases containing subscriber email addresses I cannot see a mass emailing having occurred announcing his hire. BTW lest you suggest that Mr.Benzion had prior access to the database to copy the addresses for future use.... ummmm nope.<br />So I think we can eliminate your fancy that Mrs. Lykos hired Mr. Benzion to gather some new LST constituency.<br /> <br /> <b>As a matter of fact, when Benzion shut down the Lone Star Times website, he encouraged his readers to get their Republican Reading needs fulfilled by going and checking out Big Jolly's blog.</b><br /> <br />Ummm wrong again. If you go to the LST "tombstone" it says exactly this:<br /><b>BigJolly.com is highly recommended for the Texas and Houston political scene.</b><br />I penned that recommendation as a courtesy to our readers and bloggers that continued elsewhere.<br /> <br /> I find it interesting that the blog post that caused you to accuse Mr. Jennings of conspiracy. Mr. Jennings went to the source for his story. At the bottom of the LST tombstone is this invitation:<br /> <br /><b>If you have any questions about this page please contact Squawk at (my email address is pictured)</b><br /> <br />I checked my spam filters and inbox, nope no email from you concerning Mr. Benzion's recommending Mr. Jennings' web page/blog. Unlike you Mr Jennings sources are real people, not some fanciful idea pulled out of thin air. <br /> <br />Now a little conjecture on my part. Having muddled around the kings and queens of politics myself over the years, well just a minute:<br /> <br /><b>But what really and truly bothers me is that Big Jolly's affiliation with Lone Star Times and David Benzion, coupled with his sudden unprecedented access to Lykos (for the purposes of writing fawning articles) sure makes it look like Big Jolly has become a shill. </b><br /> <br /><b>TALK ABOUT CONSPIRACY THEORIES</b> <br /><br />A well written freedom of information request can get even you into visit with Mrs Lykos. But I am just guessing that is how Mr. Jennings did it. Did you ask him? I did not think so.<br /> <br /><b>You know how crazy people can get with their conspiracy theories. </b><br /> <br />Yeah you are right. I am beginning to realize that, I refer you back to <i>your</i> earlier comments I replied to.<br />Anyway, thank you Mr. Murray for your time and consideration. I am not going to waste any more of my valuable time refuting your CONSPIRACY THEORIES. But puhlease pull your pants up, your fantasies are showing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-13420844871322689162012-02-07T08:33:53.739-06:002012-02-07T08:33:53.739-06:00Did someone say Lykos has a house in Maine?
Bec...Did someone say Lykos has a house in Maine? <br /><br />Because Judge Lloyd in County Civil Court at Law No. 4 does too, and guess who her husband is...<br /><br />RageAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-64052900717504500962012-02-07T07:11:07.261-06:002012-02-07T07:11:07.261-06:00You got to admit the conduct of the District Attor...You got to admit the conduct of the District Attorney's Office would look a lot less suspicious if they had not fought tooth and nail to prevent anyone from looking at their conduct, not obtained copies of the testimony of witnesses after the ADAs were excluded from the grand jury room, not investigated the grand jury, the judges and the attorneys, Palmer had not taken the 5th amendment because her answers could incriminate her, not continued to employ Palmer after she took the 5th, and moved to hide her from the press, Lykos had not lied to Oberg about the investigation and the continuing to evolve story and finally making a blatantly false statement that they were investigating a non existent crime. <br /><br />Can you say conduct consistent with guilt?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-43871152677509897402012-02-07T06:40:46.337-06:002012-02-07T06:40:46.337-06:00Anon 8:11. Jim Mount left the DA's Office in t...Anon 8:11. Jim Mount left the DA's Office in the 90's! How is that recent?<br /><br />Not Mike AndersonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-66101586432977477432012-02-07T06:21:10.561-06:002012-02-07T06:21:10.561-06:00How about we just get the Fed's to investigate...How about we just get the Fed's to investigate our Leader for all types of RICO and elected official violations? <br /><br />This would put an end to the whole conspiracy theory. Or would it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-26827243405011520982012-02-06T22:48:57.157-06:002012-02-06T22:48:57.157-06:008:11, "two former ADAs that don't like Ly...8:11, "two former ADAs that don't like Lykos" Can you name any past or present prosecutors that DO like Lykos?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7566778230970156239.post-84155038784008364752012-02-06T20:11:31.152-06:002012-02-06T20:11:31.152-06:00You gotta admit that this whole grand jury thing w...You gotta admit that this whole grand jury thing would look a whole lot less improper if some neutral special prosecutors had been appointed, instead of two former ada's who don't like Lycos.<br /><br />Out of the hundreds of possible candidates in Houston with the requisite experience to handle a grand jury, how did judge Brown just happen to select to recent departures from the office?<br /><br />Remember, we're supposed to avoid the appearance of impropriety, and the selection of these fellows as special prosecutors queers the whole deal and makes it all look suspect as hell, even if it wasn't.<br /><br />Signed,<br /><br />Not Don Hooper.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com