I have to admit that I don't remember Dane Schiller from the days before he took the job as Kim Ogg's Director of Communication at the D.A.'s Office. Maybe our paths never crossed. If they did, I don't recall it. I hear from my friends in the journalism business that he was a pretty good reporter.
When he took the job for the incoming Ogg Administration back in the beginning, his was not a name that I was familiar with, and I certainly had no beef with him. Then again, other than that small matter of her firing almost forty potential political enemies experienced prosecutors right off the bat, I didn't really have that big of an issue with Kim Ogg herself back then. I was supportive of Ogg's platform when she ran for District Attorney the first time and I voted for her -- a mistake I've regretted since early on in her administration.
But, I digress. The point I'm trying to make here is that I never had a personal beef with Dane. As a matter of fact, we actually went through almost the entirety of Ogg's first term on pretty friendly terms. I still have several e-mails in my archives of him sending me very nice messages for various and sundry things. He appreciated when I supported Ogg's request for more prosecutors. He forwarded me a copy of the paper when there was a picture of me and my kids. I think I last heard from him when he sent me a nice note after I wrote this post at the beginning of the pandemic.
He used to call me "amigo"! My, how times have changed.
As it turns out, old Dane has been working very hard behind the scene any time any media outlet quotes me with any critique of the Ogg Administration. His method of response is usually an ad hominem attack on me, which highlights three points: 1) I'm a disgruntled former prosecutor who was fired from my job; 2) I'm a Republican; and 3) I've always hated Kim Ogg. He lets the reporter and/or news agency know these things rather than argue against any of the substance of my critiques. In at least one instance, he asked the news agency to print those three things.
So, let's run these things through the old fact-checker, real quick.
1. The Disgruntled Fired Prosecutor -- to be fair, I bring a lot of this critique on myself, having gleefully pointed out my record for having been "fired twice" from the D.A.'s Office. The reason that I've always pointed it out myself is because the reasons for my firing had nothing to do with my job performance, and it was laughable to think so. In my nine and a half years as a prosecutor, I received only one negative evaluation (which was deserved -- I dropped the ball on a couple of things around the time my oldest was born). I loved working with my co-workers. I was pretty reasonable to deal with and I wasn't half bad at trial.
I was fired (the first time) by Pat Lykos when she chose not to renew my contract when she took office. It wasn't a surprise to anyone. I had campaigned hard for Kelly Siegler and I took a lot of potshots at Lykos on this blog. The moment Lykos won the election, I started making plans for a future in the defense bar. It was common sense. I got fired (the second time) when Ken Magidson decided that the contents of this blog were too disruptive for me to continue in my final week as a prosecutor. Never mind that the contents of the blog were written in my off time and probably protected by the 1st Amendment at the time of my firing, but whatever. My departure from the Office had nothing to do with me being a bad prosecutor. It just had to do with my antagonism towards Pat Lykos.
Ironically, in retrospect, Lykos did a far better job as District Attorney than Kim Ogg ever has.
2. The Republican -- I guess this is a somewhat fair criticism if you go back in time to 2015. Like most of my fellow former prosecutors, I did vote exclusively in Republican Primaries back in the day. Although I was pretty liberal for a Republican, most Harris County elections were decided in the Republican Primary before 2008, and that's where I voted. I wasn't ever a big GOP member. Didn't go to meetings or try to be a Precinct Chair or anything like that. If I had any remaining Republican ties, I can assure you that the Donald Trump Phenomenon stomped most of them out of me.
3. The Kim Ogg Hater -- Dane has to be pretty hard-pressed to argue that I was anti-Ogg from the beginning. As noted above, I voted for her over Devon Anderson (who was a friend) because I believed in Ogg's platform and the direction Criminal Justice should follow in the future. It isn't my fault that Ogg a) was no more of a progressive than Donald Trump, and b) is insane. Although I have to admit that he's correct that I think very poorly of Ogg, that dislike has been earned by her actions in office. It's not like she ran over my dog, or you know, fired me or anything.
It's not personal. Kim Ogg is just really terrible at being District Attorney and she embodies all of the negative traits of an intensely paranoid, vindictive, dumb, corrupt politician. Other than that, I'm sure she's a swell person.
Dane Schiller knows all of these things are true, so it is rather disappointing to learn of my old "amigo" telling reporters all of these things about me.
However, I'm far from being the only recipient of Dane's misinformation campaigns. He's been very front and center in leading the charge on behalf of the D.A.'s Office in scapegoating Harris County District Court Judges for the rise in crime during the pandemic, as well.
7 comments:
I've never regretted being sacked by Kim for not being part of their future plans. When some insider leaked her plan to axe me to the Chronicle she accused me of the bad pub that followed because I answered a reporter's question whether I saw it coming. You could be disloyal in that environment by displaying independent leadership and character. It's no surprise that folks in fear of losing their jobs and benefits succumb. Her entire leadership team is infected. The Democrats really need to find a viable (not me) candidate to take her out and restore honor.
I don'tthink having a flack for the district attorney in Houston is a good idea. I don't care who it is.
When I covered the DA's office for the Chronicle in the late 70s and early 80s, I had almost instant access to the elected DA. And generally, I got quick answers to my questions. One of the reasons Carol Vance and Johnny Holmes never had serious political opponents was their access to the press.
Once, I called DA VAnce to ask about a case. He said he didn't know about it but would call me back. He got Henry Onken, the head of special crimes, to bring the file to his office, brief him on the case and sit there while he talked to me so if I asked question he couldn't answer, he could ask Henry. Carol got some good press and Henry got pissed about details of his case becoming public.
I know that was a long time ago, but it was a heck of a lot better than having a flack between the press and the elected DA. As I recall, Ken Magidson who was acting DA for about nine months in 2000, hired the first flack at the office. He was a federal prosecutor and was used to the federal way of doing things.
I met with Kim before she took office, I told her to do away with the p.r. man position. She has a journalism degree and worked at the Chronicle in the day. She's really pretty good at dealing with reporters. She didn't listen.
Instead, she delegated dealing with the press to her first assistant, first Tom Berg and now David Mitchum. Bad idea.
Dealing directly with reporter can give an elected official a better feeling about what is going on in the community.
A public relations guy can serve a useful purpose for an elected official, like getting background information for the press. But the most effective spokesman for the office is the elected official.
It's an interesting and actually persuasive article, with a few fundamental questions lurking behind the scenes. Why is it that there was a rise in crime during the pandemic and what is that rise, quantifiably? Sounds like a question for Grits. He's been depressed lately, and I think he should definitely enable comment moderation on his blog so it's not just spam comments. Couldn't hurt.
Who gives crap if someone got fired or quit a job? If you've never been fired or quit, you've probably not made a principled stand or have been one of the lucky few to have an honest employer. It's not just DAs who have schills. What is it about the staff who work for lawyers that they are willing to lie about the whereabouts of the attorney as if it were perfectly natural. You talk to some of them and you think to yourself "gosh, is there anything she wouldn't do for someone as long they sign that paycheck for another week?" Life is too short to lie for people. I'd rather be dead. Getting fired was always a blessing in disguise. An honest man is man not happy with a naked scramble for resources. BTW, is there not a bit of a resemblance between Murray and Dane? Not sure what feature it is, can't quite put my finger on it...
Word is that Ogg and entourage got up in the middle of the funeral for Corporal Galloway and left for a previously scheduled engagement at a bar; then fellow Democrat County Judge Hidalgo really showed her azz during the funeral service:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmDGrBUhkyo&ab_channel=themichaelberryshow
Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo accused of 'disrespect' at slain corporal's funeral
https://www.fox26houston.com/news/harris-co-judge-hidalgo-accused-of-disrespect-at-slain-corporals-funeral
This aged well.
Dane before working for Harris County DA was writing fiction about Twin Peaks for the Attorney Generals office. Pushing a false narrative that DPS was not involved as they were in the training that led up to Twin Peaks, on request from the Governor, who refused to release 14M in Motorcycle Safety funds for equipment to the CoCI, which the BMC was a part of.
Post a Comment