Guess Who Is Back

By -
The Chronicle is reporting that Lloyd Kelley is requesting $4.4 million for his legal fees from representing the Ibarra Brothers in their lawsuit.

I think the county should consider three questions before paying Lloyd anything more:

1. Is it fair for you to be getting almost three times what your clients had to split between the two of them?

2. Did you bill your fees for all your press conferences calling for Chuck Rosenthal and Tommy Thomas' ouster?

AND

3. Shouldn't these bills really be paid by Clarence Bradford's campaign fund?

Comments

Mark Bennett said…
You think it's up to the county?
March 19, 2008 at 8:07 AM
Murray Newman said…
No, I think the county should be asking those questions. But technically, they could just agree to pay some amount.
March 19, 2008 at 8:11 AM
Michael said…
I think Kelley's request for $2.2 million is not out of line for the settlement that his clients received. As the article reports, HC fought him tooth and nail on a case that was ultimately indefensible. Stafford's remarks about no one winning on the merits and the "substantial sum" offered at mediation ($350,000 could be considered a substantial sum in many cases, but not in this one) sound specious to me. You can deny liability until the cows come home, but when you're writing a check for $1.7 million, it's pretty clear who won and who lost.

I also think a federal judge won't balk at a fee petition that exceeds the damages recovered by the plaintiffs.

The multiplier seems a bit more iffy to me.
March 19, 2008 at 10:40 AM
Ron in Houston said…
On one hand he deserves it because Harris County really did give him a hard time.

He's just such a goofball.

What's that old phrase about a blind squirrel finding an acorn now and then.
March 19, 2008 at 11:32 AM
Scott C. Pope said…
Kelly is a scumbag. Remember when he said that a simple letter of apology would have made it all go away? Perhaps we should send him one of those.
March 19, 2008 at 3:25 PM
Michael said…
Well, a timely letter of apology might have saved Harris County citizens a lot of money. But the barn's empty now.
March 19, 2008 at 6:50 PM
jigmeister said…
Looking in the rear view mirror, you're right Michael, but Ron is right Kelley is a goofball that I sure hate to see get rich over this. You're also right about Hoyt. He is notorious about screwing the taxpayer. Outside the course and scope ought to make them personally liable, because these cops certainly were. I know it doesn't work that way though. Unfortunately a county as large as Harris figures lawsuits into the budget I guess.
March 19, 2008 at 7:27 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boss Ogg's Slate

By -
Image
  In a meeting with the judges a year or so ago, Harris County District Attorney's Office First Assistant David Mitcham expressed his frustration with the judges and bond reform, giving them a warning that those who didn't share District Attorney Kim Ogg's "vision" would face "consequences."   Those who were present for the meeting (at least the ones that I spoke with) indicated that the implication was that the Office intended to field candidates to run against those judges who weren't bending to the District Attorney's will.  At least, that's how they interpreted Mitcham's words. Now that the filing deadline has passed, it is abundantly clear that Mitcham's veiled threat was not an empty one as a significant number  almost every  of judicial races now has a prosecutorial candidate running as either a Democrat or Republican.  Some are great candidates.  Others . . . not so much.  A few are royal disasters, but we will talk about that
Read more

Scapegoating the Judges

By -
Image
When I was growing up in Bryan (which was a far smaller town in the 1970s than it is now), I was brought up under the belief that judges were the closest thing to nobility that a small Texas town had to offer.  We only had one District Court Judge in Brazos County back then (compared to the whopping three, count 'em, THREE that Brazos has now), and he was a family friend.  When our families socialized, Judge McDonald was treated with a little more reverence by us kids because of the fact that he was a judge. [On a personal side note, Judge W.T. "Tommy" McDonald passed away this past year.  He was a dear, sweet man who was always very kind to me growing up and he kept up with my legal career from law school on forward.  He meant a lot to our family and he is very missed.  He deserved all of the love and respect that he received.] After 22 years of being a lawyer, I recognize that judges are a little more fallible than I was raised to believe.  As any practicing lawyer can
Read more

The "Genius and Miraculous" District Attorneys' Office

By -
Image
Oh man.   Kimbra.   Just when I think she can't be a more shamelessly self-aggrandizing politician, she pulls something new out of her little white Boss Ogg hat. Today, she released a pre-recorded message to her Assistant District Attorneys that was chock full of pure political awesomeness as she laid out her plans for solving the backlog of criminal cases in Harris County, Texas.  At one point, she literally applauds the work of her office as "nothing short of genius and miracles." Seriously. If you would like to watch it in its entirety, here it is. NOTE:  If you are reading this on an iPhone, the video may not play, but you can get to it by clicking here . If you don't have thirty minutes to enjoy Kim Ogg celebrating herself, here are some of the highlights: Highlight # 1 --   Even a Pre-Recorded Kim Ogg keeps the Commoners Waiting Even though everyone is back in the building after receiving their vaccinations, Kimbra decided that she would best reach the members o
Read more